 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Quick
Guide
to
Home
Buying
or
Selling
First
|
|
You
have
decided
to
begin
looking
for
a
new
home
and
are
faced
with
the
decision
of
when
you
should
put
your
existing
home
on
the
market.
Controversy
and
debate
always
surround
this
question!
At
first
glance,
people
who
are
faced
with
this
question
think
that
they
should
first
locate
their
future
home
and
put
it
securely
under
contract.
There
is
rationale
for
this
choice,
although
it
is
often
the
least
prudent
option
of
the
two
choices
that
are
available.
By
first
locating
the
new
home,
you
will:
- Know
how
much
equity
you
will
need
to
take
out
of
your
existing
house
in
order
to
afford
the
new
one.
- Know
when
you
will
need
to
finalize
the
sale
of
your
existing
house
in
order
to
move
into
the
new
house.
- Know
that
you
will
have
a
place
to
live
when
you
move
out
of
your
existing
house.
Although
the
logic
behind
these
reasons
is
sound,
most
people
who
are
experienced
in
"moving
up"
to
another
home
will
argue
that
it
makes
more
financial
sense
to
list
your
home
first,
and
then
begin
the
house
hunting
process.
The
following
scenario
will
help
to
demonstrate
the
serious
consequences
that
can
occur
when
a
party
commits
to
buying
a
property
without
first
having
initiated
the
sale
of
their
present
home.
Case Study
Using
logic
similar
to
that
listed
above,
the
Smiths
decide
to
first
select
their
new
home
and
then,
once
they
know
what
it
will
cost,
put
their
existing
home
on
the
market.
They
discover
and
fall
in
love
with
a
home
that
meets
all
of
their
needs
and
they
make
an
offer.
The
offer
is
accepted,
but
they
are
not
allowed
to
make
the
offer
contingent
upon
the
sale
of
their
first
house
(most
sellers
will
not
allow
these
contingencies).
They
push
the
closing
date
out
as
far
as
the
seller
will
allow
them,
which
they
believe
will
give
them
ample
time
to
sell
their
home.
They
have
three
months
to
find
a
buyer
and
close
on
the
sale
of
their
existing
home.
They
scurry
to
complete
the
upgrades
that
had
long
been
planned
for
their
existing
home,
managing
to
put
the
home
on
the
market
the
following
weekend.
They
price
it
where
they
have
seen
other
similar
homes
sell,
and
where
they
can
reasonably
expect
to
attract
some
interest.
And
they
begin
to
wait.
The
first
week
there
are
a
good
number
of
showings,
but
then
the
activity
drops
off.
The
market
seems
to
have
softened
a
little,
and
the
Smiths
begin
to
think
they
should
lower
their
price.
This
is
a
bit
of
a
concern,
since
they
were
counting
on
selling
very
near
the
current
sales
price
and
rolling
the
proceeds
into
the
purchase
of
the
new
property.
Three
more
weeks
pass.
There
have
been
intermittent
showings,
and
very
few
repeat
showings.
The
real
estate
sales
agent
is
running
ads,
passing
out
brochures,
and
has
held
an
Open
House.
One
offer
comes
in,
but
this
buyer
has
a
home
they
have
to
sell
in
order
to
close.
The
Smiths
can't
risk
accepting
this
offer,
since
it
would
mean
taking
their
home
off
of
the
market
while
they
wait
for
the
buyer
to
come
through.
They
have
to
turn
the
offer
down.
|
|
|
|
|
The
sales
agent
knows
they
are
feeling
the
time
pressure,
and
suggests
another
price
reduction.
Now
the
Smiths
are
concerned
that
if
an
offer
comes
in
much
below
this
new
price,
they
might
be
hard
pressed
to
come
up
with
the
down
payment
on
the
new
house.
The
Smiths
are
facing
a
closing
on
their
new
home
within
six
weeks,
and
they
still
don't
have
a
buyer
for
their
existing
home.
They
begin
to
look
into
securing
a
bridge
loan,
which
would
allow
them
to
purchase
their
new
home
while
carrying
the
mortgage
on
the
existing
home.
They learn that bridge loans come with some strings
attached:
1.
Lenders
who
offer
bridge
loans
are
difficult
to
find.
Very
few
financial
institutions
pursue
this
line
of
lending
because
it
is
short
term
and
high
risk.
2.
To
qualify
for
a
bridge
loan,
the
Smiths
must
show
enough
income
and
net
worth
to
carry
both
the
existing
home
and
the
new
property.
In
other
words,
the
lender
views
this
as
two
complete
mortgages,
which
is
exactly
what
it
is.
Even
if
approved,
the
Smiths
are
deeply
concerned
about
their
ability
to
pay
two
mortgages
at
once.
3.
The
rates
on
the
bridge
loan
are
not
competitive,
which
threatens
to
further
strain
the
financial
picture
of
the
Smiths.
This story only has 3 possible conclusions.
First,
the
Smiths
get
very
lucky
and
accept
an
offer
on
their
home,
which
goes
straight
to
closing
without
any
problems.
Unfortunately,
they
receive
considerably
less
than
expected
since
the
word
had
gotten
out
that
they
were
desperate
to
sell.
Second,
the
Smiths
find
a
bridge
loan
that
they
can
live
with
-
barely
-
and
end
up
buying
the
second
home
and
carrying
the
first
home
for
another
couple
of
months.
The
financial
strain
is
extreme,
as
is
the
strain
on
their
marriage.
Suddenly,
everyone
wants
to
know
whose
idea
it
was
to
buy
the
new
house
without
at
least
putting
the
existing
house
on
the
market.
Third,
the
Smiths
do
not
find
a
buyer
and
they
fail
to
secure
a
bridge
loan.
The
seller
of
the
home
they
put
under
contract
sues
them
for
defaulting
on
the
loan.
After
this
experience,
the
Smiths
decide
that
they
will
live
in
their
original
home
forever
and
invest
whatever
money
they
have
left
to
just
make
it
look
nicer.
The
lesson
to
be
learned:
be
cautious
and
thoughtful
in
making
this
very
important
decision
about
when
you
put
your
home
on
the
market.
You
must
assess
your
financial
picture
honestly,
as
well
as
your
ability
to
handle
the
stress
that
will
accompany
any
decision
you
make.
Be
aware
of
the
downside
of
buying
before
placing
your
own
home
on
the
market,
because
the
worst
case
scenario
can
be
extremely
costly
and
difficult
to
bear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|